|  
               
            December 6, 2000: 
              On 
              the Campus 
            The vision 
              thing 
              University 
              presidents need it too--and students need to understand it 
            When President Shapiro 
              announced in October that he would be stepping down, the news - 
              among the most important with which a university has to deal - should 
              have reverberated throughout the student body for weeks. And yet, 
              after a few days of almost obligatory Prince coverage, campus discussion 
              of the Princeton presidency quickly moved on to talk of midterms 
              and the national election. 
            Most students, myself 
              included, have only a very vague idea of what President Shapiro 
              does for the university on a daily basis, and as a consequence the 
              office of University President seems unconnected to daily student 
              life. To an extent, the president is uninvolved in the day-to-day 
              activity of campus, and students recognize that the deans and lower-level 
              administrators are more directly responsible for student life. Even 
              so, most students express a desire to see the president - and evidence 
              of his immediate impact - much more frequently. 
            If students have a difficult 
              time understanding the president's broader role in molding university 
              strategy, it is even more difficult for them to appreciate, over 
              the course of only four years at Princeton, the tangible outcomes 
              of that strategy. And perhaps that is the source of the disconnect 
              between students and broader administrative efforts to define Princeton's 
              future direction.  
            Asked what they believe 
              the role of the president is, many students cite finance and fundraising 
              - yet to those same students the recently completed capital campaign 
              seems chiefly an opportunity to lower tuition, an issue of significance 
              to them. Few are aware of the broader programs, such as initiatives 
              in teaching, the new genomics center, and expanded academic offerings, 
              that the campaign is helping to fund -- largely because it is 
              difficult for the administration to get students to think long-term 
              about the university. 
            This communication problem 
              seems particularly pronounced at present, because President Shapiro's 
              personal vision, while critically important, is particularly intangible 
              to students. Some point to his efforts to put Princeton on truly 
              solid financial ground, while others name his efforts to maintain 
              a viable physical campus space, but it is hard for students to identify 
              the immediate effect of an enormous endowment, a new building, or 
              fresh landscaping on their lives. 
            Students, instead, want 
              strategic agendas to which they feel connected. Senior Todd Johnson, 
              asked what the principal strategic driver for the next president 
              should be, calls for "less focus on physical infrastructure, 
              and more on social infrastructure - the university community," 
              citing the creation of the residential college system in the early 
              1980s as an example. Senior Joseph Wheatley, on the other hand, 
              believes the next crucial strategic issue is "keeping the concept 
              of the university relevant - juggling a physical university with 
              technology and distance." While very different from each other, 
              both of these agendas are closely tied to student life and issues 
              of student interest. Most important, both are visions in which students 
              can identify their place. 
            Whether the next president 
              will pursue those types of visions is yet to be determined. And 
              whether the next president will choose to play a more visible role 
              in daily student life remains to be seen; despite student complaints, 
              being a good president does not require it. But one thing, at least, 
              is clear: Whoever the next president is, and whatever his or her 
              vision for Princeton, students need to be given a better idea of 
              how the university's vision - the president's vision - relates to 
              them. That way, even if the president chooses not to be active among 
              students, they still will have a handle on that president's role. 
              And in the long run, that sense of connectedness will allow students 
              to feel a part of the long-term institution of Princeton rather 
              than part of a mere four-year blip - which will build a stronger 
              alumni base for the next president's capital campaign. And then, 
              no doubt, this process of choosing a new president and a new vision 
              will begin again.   
            Alex Rawson (ahrawson@princeton.edu) 
              is a senior from Shaker Heights, Ohio. 
            Editor's note: The writer's 
              father chairs the presidential search committee. 
               
            
              
               |