|  
      
       
 
 Focus 
        on the Woodrow Wilson School 
 It has been a fascinating three 
        months at the Woodrow Wilson School. We are the only school of public 
        and international affairs in the world that can boast a Nobel Laureate 
        on its faculty. Daniel Kahnemans achievement highlights some of 
        the most distinctive features of the School. As a psychologist, his work 
        on how human beings value the things they have over the things they could 
        have, and how they make decisions under uncertainty, has underpinned the 
        creation of an entirely new field of economics, behavioral economics, 
        in which economists draw on cognitive psychology and work with psychologists 
        to revise their traditional paradigm of the completely rational homo economicus. 
         Here is cutting-edge research 
        in one discipline with revolutionary implications for multiple others, 
        ultimately changing the basic assumptions that we rely on to address critical 
        public problems. All of our Masters in Public Affairs (MPA) students must 
        take a basic course in psychology for policy analysis and implementation. 
        Integrating these insights with the economic, statistical and political 
        techniques that they learn to apply in diagnosing problems and proposing 
        solutions is a critical part of the toolkit they bring to the world of 
        public and international affairs when they graduate.  The School brings together 
        an extraordinary faculty from multiple disciplinespolitics, economics, 
        psychology, sociology, physics, molecular biology, geosciences and lawto 
        train students at both the undergraduate and graduate levels and to generate 
        knowledge with a direct or indirect application to domestic and international 
        policy problems. Of particular interest is the 
        teaching and research that we do in the international area. In recent 
        years, many of our leading faculty in international politics have retired 
        or moved to higher academic office, so we are in the process of rebuilding. 
        Among our current faculty, Aaron Friedberg, Director of the Center for 
        International Studies, has just published an edited volume that is proving 
        highly influential in national security strategy. Entitled Strategic Asia 
        2001-2002: Power and Purpose, it compares strategy and power across Asia. 
        Michael Doyle is finishing a two-year public service leave as Assistant 
        Secretary General of the United Nations, where he has been advising Kofi 
        Annan on issues such as the Global Compact, a UN initiative with corporations 
        around the world to improve labor, environmental and human rights standards. 
        Among assistant professors, Gary Bass has published the only systematic 
        look at war crimes trials over time and around the world. His book, Stay 
        the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals, is a fascinating 
        read.  On the economic front, chair 
        of the economics department and WWS faculty member Gene Grossman has just 
        won a best book award from the American Political Science Association 
        for his work with Elhanan Helpman on the special interests in domestic 
        politics that shape trade policy. Anne Case, a graduate alumna of the 
        School, is pioneering studies of poverty, inequality and health in South 
        Africa. She currently oversees, with Angus Deaton, a large-scale survey 
        collecting data on a range of traditional and non-traditional measures 
        of well-being, including income and consumption, measures of health status 
        (including mental health), morbidity, crime, social connectedness and 
        intra-household relationships.  Cases work highlights 
        an important trend and challenges us to rethink our definition of international 
        affairs. Consider, for instance, the intersection between public 
        health and national security. The AIDS epidemic has altered security relationships 
        in Africa in ways that can impede the pursuit of terrorists. Conversely, 
        issues formerly only viewed as security concerns, such as civil wars, 
        are now being looked at as public health threats. The disintegration of 
        governments and societies is a breeding ground for migrants and pathogens 
        alike.  Problems of domestic public 
        health are also being reanalyzed through comparative case studies. For 
        example, Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs Sara McLanahan, most 
        noted for her research on fragile families within the United 
        States, also studies the nature of the family across national boundaries. 
        In a recent book she draws lessons for the United States about single 
        mother families and social politics from the experiences of Canada, France 
        and Sweden. Experts in demography and public health, such as Burt Singer, 
        Noreen Goldman and Betsy Armstrong, study issues ranging from disease 
        control to contraception to the impact of stress and trauma on biological 
        and psychological well-being in comparative context.  A second example of the growing 
        connectedness of international and domestic issues, both in practice and 
        scholarship, is in the area of economic regulation. Professor Robert Willig, 
        the former Assistant Deputy Attorney General for Economics in the Department 
        of Justice, writes widely on the international political effects of domestic 
        regulation in areas such as antitrust and telecommunications, as well 
        as on comparative experiences with privatization in developing countries. 
        In science, technology and the environment, issues such as air pollution, 
        climate change and wildlife conservationthe respective specialities 
        of Assistant Professor Denise Mauzerall and Professors Michael Oppenheimer 
        and David Wilcoveare inherently global.  In sum, it is fitting that 
        a school of public and international affairs should take account of the 
        blurring of the boundary between the two, to the point of dissolution. 
        Our efforts to construct a more secure, stable and just world depend on 
        research and teaching in health, extraterritorial economic regulation 
        and the environment as much as on more traditional studies in international 
        security and political economy. Our domestic faculty and our 
        international faculty are crossing these boundaries in ways 
        that are likely to redefine both the academy and the world we study.  
 
 
  |