February 12, 2003: Reading Room
A history major at Princeton and later a law clerk for the late Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, Kennedy discussed Nigger and his new book, Interracial Intimacies: Sex, Marriage, Identity and Adoption (Pantheon), with PAW contributor Louis Jacobson 92. For a longer version of this interview, go to www.princeton.edu/paw.
Why did you write Nigger? I was in my office one day thinking about words like discrimination and racism, and all of a sudden this word popped into my mind. And I thought, my God, heres a word thats certainly familiar to me and familiar to lots of people. I thought, where did it come from? Who first used it? How did it become a slur? The book sheds light on race relations, history, and the nature of language. They come together in a very vivid form through the prism of this troublesome word. The wide variety of usages and attitudes toward the word is part of what attracted me. What an interesting, remarkable, linguistic phenomenon this is, that people would be so self-conscious about it. There arent many words that prompt that sort of response. Do you ever use the word yourself? I have no problem using the word for purposes of pedagogy. In my courses, if Im talking about the Jim Crow system, this word figures into it. However, do I use the word as a term of endearment or solidarity? No. People should have to bear the burden of explaining precisely why theyre using it. Whats your new book about? I try to show the extraordinary degree to which there has been interracial intimacy throughout American life. And I also try to show the extent that fear of interracial intimacy has been a factor in American law and American life. Forty-two states have had antimiscegenation laws at one time or another. I talk about what happened when it was against the law for different races to intermarry or have sexual relations. Part of what I do is to try to relate information. But my more political, ideological point is that Im against any state and communal impediments to interracial intimacy. Is this still an issue? Yes, in certain cases it is still an issue, especially adoption. Until recently, there was quite a strong, codified policy of racial matching in adoptions. I attack that position tooth and nail. I think it has been very hurtful to children in need of parents, its been hurtful to people who want to raise children, and its been ideologically hurtful, because to embrace that position means suggesting that the racially homogeneous family is to be preferred.
BOOK SHORTS
|