Letters from alumni about
Robert Mueller 66
May 7, 2002
Thanks for printing my letter. I hope I don't now
become the latest Peter Singer or Shirley Tilghman whipping boy
for all the reactionary old Tigers. Poor Daniel Erdman.....
I hope PAW will reprint Prof. Richard Falk's excellent article on
the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the Nation (Apr. 29). Clearest
analysis I've read in years of following the deteriorating situation
very closely. I'm so sorry I didn't take his course. Had a writing
block and was scared of the term paper....
Ken Scudder 63
San Francisco, Calif.
Respond
to this letter
Send
a letter to PAW
May 3, 2002
I agree with Frank Schaffer '45,
Jeffrey S. Oppenheim '84, Larry Seabrook '56, and Burnet Fisher
'46 and their responses to Daniel Erdman '73's letter regarding
Donald Rumsfeld '54. Now we have
Tim McKee '92, of Sacramento, California, and Ken
Scudder '63, of San Francisco, climbing aboard in their negative
comments about FBI Director Robert Mueller '66 as well as Rumsfeld.
California has more than its share of odd ones and letters such
as these two help to confirm it.
Heartiest congratulations to both Rumsfeld and Mueller for the great
jobs they are performing for our country. I am proud of the fact
that they are fellow graduates of Princeton.
Irv Walsh '41
Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif.
Respond
to this letter
Send
a letter to PAW
April 24, 2002
This letter was prompted by the continuing debate
over the images of FBI Director Robert Mueller 66 and Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld 54.
One may differ with Mr. Mueller or Secretary Rumsfeld on a particular
decision that they have made. However, we must recognize that they
have earned these esteemed positions of leadership because they
have been good at self-discipline, goal setting, and drafting effective
courses of action throughout their careers.
Furthermore, the teamwork they have encouraged in their agencies
supports my opportunity to write my opinion in a safe environment.
Susan C. Laden s70
Tampa, Fla.
Respond
to this letter
Send
a letter to PAW
February
5, 2002
With respect for your good journalistic instinct to feature Princetonian
newsmakers in PAW, and with understanding that Secretary of Defense
(War?) Donald Rumsfeld '54 and FBI Director Robert Mueller '66 have
difficult jobs, I still must demur from the accolades your cover
article (November 21) on them has prompted.
These
two give the U.S. a bad name, and by doing so reflect badly on our
university. I'm glad more people don't know they went to Princeton.
Mueller, who as an attorney should know better, has stonewalled
counsel for more than a thousand immigrants being held incommunicado
and without charge. And Rumsfeld, with his puffed-up, self-righteous
manner and his seeming lack of a "decent regard to the opinions
of mankind" to say nothing of the lives of anyone other
than Americans projects just the kind of arrogant, imperialist
persona that is driving even our allies up the wall. I was embarrassed
when he tried to deflect the international outcry over the shocking
photos of drugged, shackled, hooded prisoners in cages with the
lame remark that he was a law school dropout. This was on a par
with President Bush's dumb-and-dumber remark that he'd slept through
his years at Yale.
I think it's fair to expect that the Princeton experience (we don't
expect as much from Yale) can impart a certain urbanity and generosity
of spirit, as befits the fortunate recipients of an elite university's
liberal education. Such admirable traits appear to be conspicously
lacking in your story's subjects, however powerful they may be.
Ken Scudder '63
San Francisco, Calif.
Respond
to this letter
Send
a letter to PAW
December
20, 2001
With reference to your November 21 issue, I want to thank PAW for
the articles
on Donald Rumsfeld 54 and Robert Mueller 66. I was
not aware that they were alumni, and I am very proud of them. These
articles should also be made available to all undergraduate and graduate
students to show Princeton in the nation's service.
I also read in the same issue Abhi Raghunathan 02s article
"The New Reality" (On the Campus), where he indicates that
there have been peace activists on campus, debates between students
and professors about war and terrorism, plus scathing letters to the
editor and stern criticisms of professors on the editorial pages of
the Daily Princetonian. I think that Princeton alumni would
be very interested in what has been transpiring on campus after September
11, very little of which I have seen in PAW. It would give the alumni
some idea of what is going on. For instance, I logged onto the Daily
Princetonian today and saw the article by Nicholas Guyatt, a graduate
student from England, which basically criticized U.S. policy in the
Middle East, not his own country's. Are students getting both sides
of the issue? Alumni like me want to know.
Allan L. Griffith '60
Glendale, Calif.
Respond
to this letter
Send
a letter to PAW
December
1, 2001
Congratulations on
the November.21 articles on the important leadership roles of
Donald H. Rumsfield 54, secretary of defense, and Robert S.
Mueller III 66, FBI director.
Princeton has reason
to be proud of the contributions that these two are now making to
the national welfare of America.
Is Princeton today graduating
seniors who will be equally qualified to perform major roles in
national leadership in future years?
Ralph S. Cannon Jr. 31
*35
Spruce Pines, N.C.
Respond
to this letter
Send
a letter to PAW
Go
back to our online Letter Box Table of Contents
|